Error consistency between humans and machines as a function of presentation duration
Abstract
Within the last decade, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have emerged as powerful computer vision systems that match or exceed human performance on some benchmark tasks such as image classification. But whether current ANNs are suitable computational models of the human visual system remains an open question: While ANNs have proven to be capable of predicting neural activations in primate visual cortex, psychophysical experiments show behavioral differences between ANNs and human subjects as quantified by error consistency. Error consistency is typically measured by briefly presenting natural or corrupted images to human subjects and asking them to perform an n-way classification task under time pressure. But for how long should stimuli ideally be presented to guarantee a fair comparison with ANNs? Here we investigate the role of presentation time and find that it strongly affects error …
Wieland Brendel
Principal Investigator (PI)
Wieland Brendel received his Diploma in physics from the University of Regensburg (2010) and his Ph.D. in computational neuroscience from the École normale supérieure in Paris (2014). He joined the University of Tübingen as a postdoctoral researcher in the group of Matthias Bethge, became a Principal Investigator and Team Lead in the Tübingen AI Center (2018) and an Emmy Noether Group Leader for Robust Machine Learning (2020). In May 2022, Wieland joined the Max-Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems as an independent Group Leader and is now a Hector-endowed Fellow at the ELLIS Institute Tübingen (since September 2023). He received the 2023 German Pattern Recognition Award for his substantial contributions on robust, generalisable and interpretable machine vision. Aside of his research, Wieland co-founded a nationwide school competition (bw-ki.de) and a machine learning startup focused on visual quality control.